Saturday, July 05, 2008

Cut Off Your Pussy: A three part treatise on the history and evolution of the sexual double standard



PART 1.

The old sexual standard



A BRIEF PRIMER ON THE HISTORY OF THE SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARD: the ancient sexual double standard stems from primitive woman's weakness.



Why do we need to learn about the double standard? Because you can't spend more than 5 minutes on the Internet looking for the latest self pics of Disney teen stars without being interrupted by some middle aged feminist and her gravity obeying tits shouting, "My VAGINA IS UGLY AND THAT IS SO NOT FAIR! Why DO MEN GET BETTER LOOKING WITH AGE? Why ARE ONLY WOMEN JUDGED FOR THEIR BEAUTY?"

How you can learn to stop blaming men for the sexual double standard...and start loving YOUR EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY.

Not so long ago during the infancy of our species, womankind, struck a Faustian bargain with the male sex. Man promised to protect woman. The task of protecting woman was not easy. Woman wants shoes. Many shoes. Woman carries shoes even at risk of getting eaten by bears.


Man evolved from his selfish animal need to survive in order to satisfy his promise to protect woman, which is why men walk on the outside of a sidewalk when on a date. Men know their bodies can't stop cars, and it really doesn't make a difference because the odds of getting run over are small and getting in the way of a car is not really going to slow the car down, but women accept this token of protection because they get the pleasure of knowing we promise to die first.



CULTURE TEACHES MAN ONE THING:

IN THE EVOLUTIONARY LONG TERM THE SUBJUGATION OF WOMAN IS UNTENABLE

[see part three]

tHE POWER OF CULTURAL LOGIC IS THAT IT RUNS ITS OWN COURSE, iT CARES NOT FOR THE SELFISH INTEREST OF THE INDIVIDUAL. THE POWER MEN DERIVE FROM CULTURE STEMS FROM ITS REALITY TESTING AND TRUTH TELLING.



MAN EVOLVED FROM A (RELATIVE) POSITION OF STRENGTH TO CREATE CULTURE, on the other hand, women are weak and evolve towards cuteness.



Nature has a communication method all its own. When a thing is cute that is nature's way of saying, "Ignore me. I am not a danger to you. Also please don't eat me." No creature will eat anything cute. It's just not done. That is why the panda and the koala bear survive.

***A tHING tO REMEMBER***


a WoMAN is "cute," because she is no threat [evolutionary SPEAKING] to MAN.


Because women are weaK, women MUST be cute. Women do that thing where they trace their finger down your arm when they are walkING away from hugging you. They lose hair in all the right places. They are soft and like to smell like vanilla. I like those things about women. So do the lions and jackals. We must accept the evolutionary truth that "iN THE PAST IT MADE PERFECT SENSE fOR A WOMAN TO CEDE CONTROL OF HER BEING TO HER MAN FOR PROTECTION."

{HINT}

A woman will tell you men that it doesn't matter what your dick "looks like." When the woman wishes to seduce a man in order to aquire his protection she will will tell him,"that it does not matter how big or small your penis is." In addition, she will tell him that she does not care how big or fat or how bald he is, because looks are not as important to women as they are to men.

The woman who tells you "looks are unimportant to her" knows an important fact, but has stretched that fact to fit a lie.

DO NOT MISTAKE A WOMAN'S LACK OF SEXUAL INTEREST IN YOU TO BE INDICATIVE OF A LACK OF SUPERFICIALITY

AN ASIDE: The differing superficiality of the sexes should be understood as the differing mating strategies of the sexes.


YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE WOMAN SEEKS YOUR PROTECTION AND SHE WILL ATTEMPT TO MASK HER INTENTIONS to you

A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE IMPORTANCE WOMEN PLACE ON THE SCURRILOUS CHARGE OF MALE SUPERFICIALITY

For eons women have complained that men seek only beauty in a mate. ( They forgive us when we create the David, or mono lisa, or the empire state building, do they not?) Was this also not because in the past the only commodity a woman had to offer was the beauty of her offspring?

Women who complain about men who place a high imporance on thier mate's beauty are simply those women nature has failed to bestow its bounty on. It is a defense used by the ugly.

REMEMBER an ugly woman is a weak woman from the point of view of nature.

The ugly woman seeks to distract the male from his natural mating strategy: to procreate with the most attractive female available. An ugly woman seeks to contaminate beauty by conflating it with superficiality. This is an effective and deviously clever strategy. Naturally man is wary of the superficial. Man's caution around superficiality is the reason why he owns only 3 pairs of shoes at a time, a number most women find unfathomable.

***REMEMBER****

Man is not superficial. His desire for the most attractive female available is simply the most effective mating strategy nature has ever developed.

***

A woman who is obsessed with superficial will spend the resources of a man foolishly. With his resources wasted a man can not protect his mate, nor could he aquire additional mates he desires. This is why a woman marries as rich a man as she can, but spends him to the poor house.

Therefore; men are naturally wary of superficial women. An ugly (but clever) woman exploits this weakness by suggesting that the male preoccupation with attractive mates is superficial spending. But a woman will never admit her concern with male 'superficiality' is mearly her displeasure over male mating strategies that place her at the bottom of the rung.


{ HINT CONTINUED}

Women don't care about 'your looks,' because they know looks are not highly correlated with money. The secret to the old sexual double stand was that men WERE not judged on looks but on their earning potential*.

translation- A woman uses your income to measure how much you can protect them from the cruelty of nature.



PART 2


THE CURRENT STATE OF THE SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARD


THE SECRET TO THE CURRENT SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARD IS THAT MEN WILL NOW BE EVALUATED ACCORDING TO HOW MUCH THEY EARN AND HOW SEXY THEY ARE... MUCH LIKE WOMEN WHO WILL BE DRAGGED KICKING AND SCREAMING INTO THE WORLD OF WORK.



Man hoped for peace between the sexes by developing culture. Culture provides protection for both sexes and offers the possibility of equality for all. But nature has selected against this possibility. Men are selected for the qualities of the past. Men are aggressive and ugly. Science has shown the female body is preferred by lesbians, straight men and straight women. Only gay men prefer the male body. In the immediate future there is a distinct possibility that woman will likely out earn man. She is already considered the better looking sex. Power will shift slowly but inexorably from man to woman.

Once again a bitter inequality in nature will arise. As man transforms nature to reflect the softer characteristics of the female he will naturally dig his own grave.



PART 3


TOWARDS A THEORY OF THE THIRD WAVE OF SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARDS: THE tRANSGENDER OF MANPUSSY & LADYBOYS





iN THE FUTURE WE ARE ALL T-GIRLS.


Man-pussy eliminates the ugly vagina. No longer will thousands of women be subjected to the horrors of a labiaplasty. In the future we will be the "best of both worlds." Droopy tits will be a thing of the past. We all get Firm and Voluptuous implants for breasts.



We keep the dick!






Personally I can't wait for the future.




eric schaeffer on the coming revolution:

Your boyfriends, husbands, and pals are fantasizing about sucking tranny dick - June 27, 2008

Okay geniuses, this lesson is for you. Listen up, it's a little complicated so I'm gonna go reeeeal slow. I'm a straight man. All straight men look women up and down. God made us that way. Take it up with him if you have a problem with us checking you out to see if we should impregnate you to propagate the species. The same desire women have to doll themselves up so that our cocks will get hard and want to go in you to propagate the species is the same instinct we have to look at you. Straight Darwinian AND God stuff. Deal with it.


Secondly...


In general, gay men don't want to fuck trannies.
In general, gay men don't want to get fucked by doms wearing strap ons.
In general, gay guys... like to fuck other gay guys.
In general, women, gay or straight, don't want to fuck trannies.
In general, women, gay or straight, don't want to get fucked in the ass by doms wearing strap ons. (Obviously lesbians have a slightly higher proclivity of course but that's mainly in their pussies, not in their asses.)
In general, bi sexual guys like real cocks when they fuck guys and therefore don't go in for doms, some for trannies but less so than good ole regular gay guys


So that leaves one kind of people who are the NUMBER ONE GROUP INTERESTED in FUCKING OR GETTING FUCKED BY TRANNIES AND GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS BY DOMS... wait for it... STRAIGHT MEN.

It will be the powerless, straight men of the future who will transform modern society into the Third Wave I call the Transgender society.

The only way to stop this is for women to stop asking for pay raises. Women need to stop graduating from college at higher rates. We need a more level playing field in the realm of looks. Attractive women need to mate with uglier men.

My plan may not work. But if you do not try it you might as well sew a penis to your daughter's vagina.

3 comments:

Bloom said...

Nice work Romius. A true ethics masterpiece.

Freida Bee said...

I'm pretty sure that you are being reprimanded by Darminian Law for revealing the prime directive. That's why you're not getting any, Romius.

Romius T. said...

Thanks bloom. I see you understand the majesty of what I am doing.

Frieda. I knew there had to be a reason why I was not getting any. I was leaning towards me being fat bald and ugly. But we all know that can't be it!