Monday, June 12, 2006

This week in posts. Updated with Thisness.

But is string theory true? "Peter Woit, a mathematician at Columbia University, has challenged the entire string-theory discipline by proclaiming that its topic is not a genuine theory at all and that many of its exponents do not understand the complex mathematics it employs."

"In the latest issue of "Psychology of Women Quarterly", researchers find that men rate themselves and the women they just interacted with higher on sexual traits, such as flirtatiousness, than women rate men. The authors find that after a five-minute conversation with a stranger of the opposite gender, men were more likely to interpret ambiguous or friendly behavior as indicating sexual interest. "The findings suggest that men generally think in more sexual terms than women," the authors explain."

If you are between the ages of 18 and 29 you probably have a tattoo. That's why I don't have one, I am an individual. The AP " That total rises to nearly one in three for the 18-to-29 set. Just about half - 48 percent - in that age category had either a tattoo or piercing."

This is scary, This is sad, This is cool. This is cooler.

2 comments:

foxxxylove said...

I don't buy string theory, men are pigs, and I don't have a tattoo. What does all this mean? Dunno, but it still makes me waaaay smarter than Ben Rothlisberger.

romiustexis said...

That's because everybody is smarter than Ben Rothlisberger.